We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

X Permanently Suspends Grok's EU Data Training

X Permanently Suspends Grok's EU Data Training
Hendrik Human Published on 9th September 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

X, formerly known as Twitter, has permanently suspended the use of European Union (EU) user data in training its AI model, Grok. This comes following a legal challenge by the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), demanding that X halt its AI data collection practices. The suspension, which took effect in August 2024, also involves erasing all data collected between May 7th and August 1st, 2024.

The legal challenge arose due to concerns about potential violations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the EU. In response, X agreed to the DPC’s demands, leading to the case being dismissed by the Irish High Court on September 6, 2024.

Similarly, Meta has also faced regulatory pushback in the EU for the same issues, and paused its data processing in June.

The undertaking between X and the DPC obtained by TechCrunch reads that “personal data comprised in EU/EEA publicly accessible posts made and/or posted on the ‘X’ social media platform (the ‘Platform’) by EU/EEA… shall be deleted and not processed.”

X recently criticized the DPC for targeting the company over its AI model, Grok, describing the DPC’s actions as “deeply troubling.” However, under the GDPR, companies must have a valid legal basis to process personal data.

X has faced multiple GDPR complaints for using people’s data without consent for Grok’s training, which could have led to hefty fines — up to 4% of its global revenue. Despite this, no fine was imposed, although the DPC sought a court injunction to stop the data processing.

The DPC’s official statement expressed its satisfaction with the outcome. However, a European privacy advocate, Max Schrems, insisted that X got a lucky outcome stating that, “Twitter got away without any fine, despite a flagrant violation of the law,” adding that data already ingested would not be deleted. Schrems also confirmed that noyb, his nonprofit organization, would continue pursuing complaints against X.

Regulators have previously sought guidance from the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) on applying GDPR to AI chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT, resulting in a preliminary report that left key legal issues unresolved.

This comes as authorities worldwide are clamping down on the data privacy practices of big tech companies. Google is facing trial alleging that it misled Texans regarding its data collection practices. In France, authorities also arrested Telegram CEO Pavel Durov, citing the company’s encryption policies and its refusal to comply with legal requests made by governments or law enforcement.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address