We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

US Votes to Reauthorize Controversial Surveillance Laws

US Votes to Reauthorize Controversial Surveillance Laws
Keira Waddell Published on 23rd April 2024 Former Senior Writer

The US Senate has voted to reauthorize controversial surveillance laws, extending government spy powers for another two years. The bill, passed with bipartisan support by a vote of 60-34, extends Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), allowing the government to gather communications without a warrant. The decision comes after a tumultuous journey through Congress, marked by debate and opposition from senators across the political spectrum.

Section 702 of FISA permits the government to collect communications between individuals living outside and inside the US without a warrant. While proponents argue that the law is critical for combatting terrorism and detecting foreign spies, privacy advocates have long pushed for the addition of a warrant requirement and raised concerns about the potential for misuse.

The bill's passage created unlikely alliances between civil-liberty-minded Democrats and Republicans concerned about expanding government surveillance powers. A coalition of senators on both the far left and right of their parties, including Sens. Bernie Sanders and Mike Lee, voted against the measure.

The reauthorization bill faced hurdles in both the House and Senate. In the House, consideration was complicated by former President Donald Trump's influence, who urged Republicans to oppose the bill. After three failed attempts, the House passed the bill 273-147, leading to further debate and amendments in the Senate.

Efforts from both parties to mandate that the government secure a warrant before searching its databases for communications involving Americans fell short before the final Senate vote.

Senators proposed amendments to the bill, including one authored by House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Turner, which critics argued would dramatically expand surveillance authorities. However, these amendments were ultimately rejected, with leadership arguing they were unnecessary and would harm American interests.

The Senate's decision to pass the bill comes after days of consideration and debate, with senators slogging through multiple amendments before reaching a final vote early Saturday morning. President Joe Biden is expected to sign the measure into law, concluding a contentious legislative process.

While supporters of the reauthorization bill assert that it is essential for national security, opponents, including the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), continue to voice concerns about potential abuses of surveillance powers.

The reauthorization of Section 702 of FISA reflects the complex and contentious nature of government surveillance laws in the modern digital age. To protect your online communication, it’s crucial to use a trustworthy VPN.

About the Author

Keira was a senior writer at vpnMentor. She is an experienced cybersecurity and tech writer dedicated to providing comprehensive insights on VPNs, online privacy, and internet censorship.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address