We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Texas Sues GM for Allegedly Selling Drivers’ Private Data

Texas Sues GM for Allegedly Selling Drivers’ Private Data
Hendrik Human Published on 19th August 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against General Motors, accusing the automaker of unlawfully collecting and selling private driver data to insurance companies. The lawsuit, which follows an earlier investigation, claims GM misled consumers about the privacy of their information.

The lawsuit, filed on August 15, 2024, alleges that General Motors has been secretly collecting and selling driver data since 2015. Specifically, the system collects data to assess driver performance and habits by calculating “Driving Scores.” This includes taking into account “bad” driver behaviors, such as speeding, braking too fast, steering too sharply, not using seatbelts, and driving late at night.

The data, which includes detailed driving habits and personal information, was allegedly sold to insurance companies without the drivers' consent.

Called “OnStar Smart Driver,” this system has been reportedly installed on as many as 14 million GM vehicles going back as far as its 2015 models. According to a release by the General Attorney’s office, GM collected this information on over 1.5 million Texans.

An important element of the lawsuit is its focus on what appears to be GM's deceptive practices. According to the official statement, “General Motors deceived many of its customers when it compelled them to enroll in its products, including OnStar Smart Driver, as part of its vehicle “onboarding” process and told them that failing to enroll would result in the deactivation of their vehicle’s safety features.”

It continued, “Despite lengthy and convoluted disclosures, General Motors never informed its customers of its actual conduct — the systematic collection and sale of their highly detailed driving data.”

According to Paxton, GM's actions violate the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, which protects consumers from false, misleading, and deceptive business practices.

This lawsuit is the latest in an ongoing campaign by the Texas Attorney General to clamp down on big companies' data privacy abuses. Meta was also ordered to pay the state $1.4 billion for privacy violations involving its facial detection features.

“Companies are using invasive technology to violate the rights of our citizens in unthinkable ways. Millions of American drivers wanted to buy a car, not a comprehensive surveillance system that unlawfully records information about every drive they take and sells their data to any company willing to pay for it” said Attorney General Paxton in a statement.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address