We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Telegram's Data Sharing Surges Following CEO’s Arrest

Telegram's Data Sharing Surges Following CEO’s Arrest
Hendrik Human Published on 14th January 2025 Cybersecurity Researcher

Telegram, the encrypted messaging platform, experienced a sharp rise in law enforcement data requests in late 2024, triggered by CEO Pavel Durov's arrest in France in August. Durov, a dual citizen of France and Russia, was detained over accusations that he was enabling organized crime and Telegram's prior reluctance to cooperate with authorities.

Following Durov’s release on a €5 million bond, Telegram amended its privacy policy, which originally limited data sharing to only terrorism-related cases. By late September 2024, the platform had expanded this policy to include “criminal activities that violate the Telegram Terms of Service”. Telegram agreed to share IP addresses and phone numbers upon valid legal requests and committed to publishing transparency reports.

According to Telegram’s latest transparency data, shared first by 404 Media, the number of legal requests surged dramatically:

  • United States: Requests jumped from 14 (impacting 108 users) earlier in 2024 to 900 (impacting 2,253 users) by year-end.
  • India: Telegram complied with 14,641 requests, affecting 23,535 users, reflecting heightened cooperation.
  • United Kingdom: Requests rose to 142, impacting 293 users, rising from single-digit figures in prior reporting periods.

Callie Guenther, senior manager of cyber-threat research at Critical Start, stated: “This development is expected to prompt many cybercriminals to migrate to alternative platforms that prioritize privacy or employ decentralized infrastructures. Platforms such as Signal or Session may become the next hubs for illicit activities.”

Telegram’s revised policy also reflects growing global pressure on tech companies to assist law enforcement. However, critics argue that balancing these obligations with user privacy remains a contentious issue.

“The trade-off between privacy and security remains contentious,” Guenther said. “Over time, cybercriminals are likely to adapt to the new landscape, increasing the operational complexity for both investigators and cybersecurity professionals. Balancing these considerations will be essential to addressing the evolving dynamics of online threats without undermining broader privacy protections.”

Telegram insists that any shared data stems from valid judicial orders, as outlined in its privacy policy. However, critics remain skeptical about the implications of the platform’s increasing compliance, particularly for users in politically sensitive regions.

This comes as governments around the world aim to tighten control over social media companies. For example, the Vietnamese authorities implemented a law strengthening government oversight of digital platforms used by its citizens.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address