We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

South Korea Fines Meta $15 Million for Illegal Data Collection

South Korea Fines Meta $15 Million for Illegal Data Collection
Hendrik Human Published on 11th November 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

South Korea’s privacy regulator has imposed a $15 million fine on Meta, citing illegal data collection on nearly one million Facebook users. The watchdog’s investigation revealed Meta gathered sensitive personal information without users’ explicit consent, which it then shared with advertisers.

The South Korean Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC) announced the fine following a four-year probe into Meta’s data practices between 2018 and 2022. The investigation determined that Meta had gathered private details such as users’ political views, religious affiliations, and sexual orientation based on their interactions on Facebook. This data was subsequently categorized and shared with over 4,000 advertisers.

According to the PIPC, Meta violated strict privacy laws by failing to adequately inform users about this data collection. Meta’s policies did not explicitly disclose the extent of the data gathered or the ways it would be used, which the commission deemed misleading.

“While Meta collected this sensitive information and used it for individualized services, they made only vague mentions of this use in their data policy and did not obtain specific consent,” said Lee Eun Jung, a PIPC director involved in the investigation.

Meta’s response has been limited, with a spokesperson stating that the company is reviewing the PIPC’s findings. This fine follows a similar 2022 penalty when Meta and Google faced a $72 million sanction in South Korea for tracking users without their consent and using the gathered data to serve targeted ads.

This decision also follows a host of similar allegations and legal challenges for the social media giant in 2024. Meta agreed to pay the state of Texas $1.4 billion as a settlement for similar violations. What’s more, it was previously discovered that Facebook effectively spied on Snapchat’s traffic in order to gain a competitive edge.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address