We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

QNAP Fixes Several Flaws Related to Recent Security Update

QNAP Fixes Several Flaws Related to Recent Security Update
Husain Parvez Published on 1st December 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

QNAP, a leading provider of network-attached storage (NAS) devices and routers, has faced widespread criticism after a recent firmware update left many users unable to access their devices. The problematic update, QTS 5.2.2.2950 build 20241114, was released in mid-November to address multiple security vulnerabilities.

However, the update quickly caused major issues, including locking users out and breaking key system functionalities. The company responded by withdrawing the firmware within 24 hours and issuing a fixed version, but the incident has left users questioning the reliability of QNAP’s testing processes.

First noted by BleepingComputer, users reported that the firmware caused log-in errors, connectivity problems, and issues with essential applications like Malware Remover. Similar complaints were echoed on QNAP’s community forums, where affected users said downgrading to a previous version of the firmware was the only immediate solution.

The Register reported that some users also criticized QNAP’s lack of transparency by failing to identify affected models and its slow-to-respond customer support. One user commented, “I have raised this with QNAP, but so far, the devs/support are silent. Not even any guidance to any possible issues.”

Beyond the firmware issues, QNAP did address critical vulnerabilities in its devices. Among the most severe was an OS command injection flaw in QuRouter 2.4.x, identified as CVE-2024-48860, which allowed attackers to execute commands remotely. Other vulnerabilities included missing authentication checks in the Notes Station 3, enabling unauthorized access, and the possibility of server-side request forgery, which could expose sensitive data.

Similar concerns arose recently with Foxconn, another major Taiwanese company, when its subsidiary, Foxsemicon, fell victim to a LockBit ransomware attack. The incident exposed critical gaps in its cybersecurity protocols, emphasizing the growing necessity for robust defenses and proactive issue management in the tech industry.

About the Author

Husain Parvez is a Cybersecurity Researcher and News Writer at vpnMentor, focusing on VPN reviews, detailed how-to guides, and hands-on tutorials. Husain is also a part of the vpnMentor Cybersecurity News bulletin and loves covering the latest events in cyberspace and data privacy.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address