We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Meta to Pay Texas $1.4 Billion Due to Privacy Violations

Meta to Pay Texas $1.4 Billion Due to Privacy Violations
Hendrik Human Published on 3rd August 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

Meta, formerly known as Facebook, has agreed to a $1.4 billion settlement with Texas to resolve allegations that it collected and used biometric data from millions of Texas residents without their consent.

The settlement, announced by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, is the largest ever for a privacy violation case brought by a single state in the United States. The case revolves around Meta's use of facial recognition technology, specifically the “Tag Suggestions,” which Facebook rolled out in 2011 and automatically enabled for all users.

Facebook was found guilty of capturing and storing biometric information from users’ photos and videos without their explicit consent or properly explaining how the feature works. This violates Texas' “Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier” (“CUBI”) privacy law and the “Deceptive Trade Practices Act.”

According to the lawsuit, Meta's unauthorized data collection practices affected millions of users. “After vigorously pursuing justice for our citizens whose privacy rights were violated by Meta’s use of facial recognition software, I’m proud to announce that we have reached the largest settlement ever obtained from an action brought by a single State,” said Attorney General Paxton.

It’s worth noting that, in Nov 2021, Meta announced its intention to cease its facial recognition feature. As per its official statement, “We're shutting down the Face Recognition system on Facebook. People who've opted in will no longer be automatically recognized in photos and videos, and we will delete more than a billion people's individual facial recognition templates.”

This news comes at a time when social media companies are facing increasing pressure to alter their data collection practices. Earlier this year, the US House of Representatives passed a bill forcing ByteDance to either divest TikTok or be banned, citing national security concerns in regards to the China-owned social media giant collecting data on American citizens.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address