We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Lazarus Group Exploits Chrome Zero-Day With Fake DeFi Game

Lazarus Group Exploits Chrome Zero-Day With Fake DeFi Game
Hendrik Human Published on 27th October 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team (GReAT) uncovered a critical Google Chrome zero-day vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-4947, that was being exploited by the North Korean Lazarus hacking group. The attackers used a fake decentralized finance (DeFi) game called DeTankZone to target cryptocurrency users starting in February 2024.

The flaw, discovered on May 13, 2024, allowed Lazarus to execute code remotely and access sensitive browser data like cookies, authentication tokens, and saved passwords by exploiting Chrome’s V8 JavaScript engine.

Google patched the issue on May 25, 2024, in Chrome version 125.0.6422.60/.61. However, before this patch, Lazarus had already launched a malicious campaign that specifically targeted cryptocurrency investors.

The attackers set up a decoy website, detankzone[.]com, which promoted DeTankZone, an NFT-based multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) game themed around tanks. The game, presented as a legitimate blockchain project, was actively marketed through social media ads, spear-phishing emails, and premium LinkedIn accounts.

While users could download a 400MB ZIP file containing the game, it failed to run beyond the registration screen. The website’s hidden scripts, however, activated the zero-day exploit.

It was a fairly sophisticated attack, relying on Chrome's Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler, Maglev, to corrupt the browser’s memory and access the entire address space of its process.

Kaspersky noted that the attackers used a secondary flaw in Chrome's V8 engine to escape its sandbox environment. This technique enabled Lazarus to collect system information, such as CPU, BIOS, and OS data, as well as perform anti-VM and anti-debugging checks to evade detection.

Although this flaw was fixed in March 2024, it remains unclear whether Lazarus had discovered and exploited the flaw as a zero-day prior to Google’s patch, or if it was initially exploited as a 1-day vulnerability.

The malware used by Lazarus, called Manuscrypt, is a known tool in the group’s arsenal, typically utilized in cyber espionage campaigns.

The Lazarus campaign aligns with the group's previous efforts to steal digital assets, particularly cryptocurrency, to support North Korea’s economy amid international sanctions. The attackers are known for the use of elaborate social engineering tactics and exploiting software vulnerabilities to infiltrate high-value targets.

It has been a busy year for Lazarus and other North Korean counterparts. It has been previously revealed that the group was actively exploiting a Windows issue allowing them to remotely obtain kernel-level access. In other news, Kimsuky (APT43) and Andariel (APT45) were detected exploiting a VPN flaw to spread info-stealer malware.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address