We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Google Faces Trial Over Chrome Data Collection Allegations

Google Faces Trial Over Chrome Data Collection Allegations
Hendrik Human Published on 27th August 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

Google must face a trial after a US appeals court revived a lawsuit alleging that the company misled Chrome users about its data collection practices. The class action lawsuit, which has been pursued by Chrome users since 2020, claims that Google harvested user data without proper consent.

Plaintiffs argue that they were assured by the terms in Google’s Privacy Notice that certain personal data would not be collected unless they activated the "sync" function on their Chrome browsers. However, they allege that Google collected this data regardless of their sync settings.

The case, which was initially dismissed by a lower court after it was successfully proved that the plaintiffs had consented to the data collection, was revived by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 3-0 decision. The appellate court questioned whether a reasonable Chrome user would have understood that they were consenting to the data collection practices in question.

Google maintains that its data collection practices are transparent and that users are informed through clear privacy controls. "We disagree with this ruling and are confident the facts of the case are on our side," said Google spokesperson José Castañeda in a statement to The Verge.

The revived case is now being sent back to U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, who had previously dismissed it in December 2022.

This case comes amid increasing scrutiny of Big Tech, with courts and regulators around the world becoming more stringent in their oversight. Recently, Meta agreed to pay $1.4 billion due to privacy violations against Texans. In a similar case, the Texas Attorney General is suing GM for selling drivers’ personal data to insurance companies.

About the Author

Hendrik is a writer at vpnMentor, specializing in VPN comparisons and user guides. With 5+ years of experience as a tech and cybersecurity writer, plus a background in corporate IT, he brings a variety of perspectives to test VPN services and analyze how they address the needs of different users.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address