We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Columbus City Ransomware Attack Affects 500,000 People

Columbus City Ransomware Attack Affects 500,000 People
Husain Parvez Published on 9th November 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

In a massive data breach affecting Ohio's state capital, the City of Columbus confirmed that the personal information of 500,000 residents was stolen during a July ransomware attack. The attack, claimed by the Rhysida ransomware gang, exposed a wide array of sensitive data, including Social Security numbers, birth dates, addresses, and even bank account details.

The breach, which occurred on July 18 as per the notification filed with Maine’s attorney general, affected more than half of Columbus’s 900,000 residents. City officials initially claimed they had “thwarted” the attack by disconnecting their network from the internet.

The Rhysida gang has claimed to have stolen 6.5 terabytes of data, including “databases, internal logins and passwords of employees, and access to emergency service applications,” as noted in the report by TechCrunch.

After the city refused to pay Rhysida’s demand of 30 bitcoins (approximately $1.9 million at the time), the hackers began leaking the stolen data. Rhysida has posted 3.1 terabytes of “unsold” compromised data, including more than 260,000 files, to its dark web portal.

“My priority is to do everything we can to protect the residents of our city,” Columbus Mayor Andrew Ginther told the media. He also noted that the city had “extended two years of free Experian credit monitoring to all of our residents to help protect them from potential fraud or identity theft,” as quoted by The Register.

Following the leak, Columbus sought to prevent further dissemination of the data by suing cybersecurity researcher David Leroy Ross (known publicly as Connor Goodwolf), who had disclosed details of the breach and revealed that domestic violence victims’ information was among the compromised data. The lawsuit sought a restraining order against Ross, alleging that he had threatened to share Columbus’s stolen data with others.

Despite previous assurances from city officials that the leaked data was “corrupted or unusable,” Ross demonstrated that the data was accessible and intact, countering the city’s initial claims. A judge issued a temporary restraining order to prevent Ross from downloading or sharing further stolen data.

Columbus is not the only city facing the pressures of a public breach. A few months ago, the MOVEit breach exposed sensitive student information in New York City schools, emphasizing the need for improved cyber defenses in public systems nationwide.

About the Author

Husain Parvez is a Cybersecurity Researcher and News Writer at vpnMentor, focusing on VPN reviews, detailed how-to guides, and hands-on tutorials. Husain is also a part of the vpnMentor Cybersecurity News bulletin and loves covering the latest events in cyberspace and data privacy.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address