We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Brazil’s Supreme Court Upholds X Ban

Brazil’s Supreme Court Upholds X Ban
Husain Parvez Published on 5th September 2024 Cybersecurity Researcher

Brazil's Supreme Court has unanimously upheld the ban on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. The ruling, which has sparked global attention, centers on X’s failure to comply with Brazil's legal requirements, including the appointment of a local representative to address platform-related legal issues, as reported by The Guardian.

On September 2, Brazil’s Supreme Court reiterated its stance to suspend X in the country after the platform failed to meet a court-ordered deadline. Justice Flávio Dino, one of the five justices involved, argued that the company "considered itself above the rule of law."

The decision followed X's repeated non-compliance with orders to block misinformation-spreading accounts. Dino further warned that “economic power and the size of one’s bank account do not produce some strange immunity from jurisdiction,” a sentiment that echoed concerns about big tech platforms circumventing national regulations.

Elon Musk, the owner of X, responded defiantly to the ban, labeling Brazil’s Supreme Court and its decisions as part of a "woke authoritarian crusade," accusing it of undermining free speech. He expressed his frustration over what he sees as politically motivated censorship, targeting both the judiciary and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's left-leaning government.

A key aspect of the ruling was the court’s prohibition of the use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to bypass the ban. Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who ordered the original suspension, has imposed fines of 50,000 reais (about $8,910) per day on anyone caught using VPNs to access X. However, this has hardly discouraged Brazilians, as our recent reports suggest a major uptick in VPN demand after the ban was put in place.

The conflict escalated further with Musk's satellite internet company, Starlink. Initially, Starlink informed Brazil’s telecommunications regulator, Anatel, that it would not block X in Brazil, defying the court's orders. However, according to Axios, Starlink eventually reversed its stance, stating it would comply with the court’s ruling to block X in Brazil, citing “the illegal treatment of Starlink in freezing of our assets.”

Musk’s battle with Brazil’s legal system highlights the broader issue of tech giants’ accountability to national laws. X, which had over 21 million users in Brazil, has been a crucial part of the digital ecosystem. However, as BBC News pointed out, alternatives like Bluesky have already seen a surge in new users since the suspension of X. Even President Lula himself has shifted to Bluesky, highlighting how influential the ban could be in shaping the future of social media in Brazil.

About the Author

Husain Parvez is a Cybersecurity Researcher and News Writer at vpnMentor, focusing on VPN reviews, detailed how-to guides, and hands-on tutorials. Husain is also a part of the vpnMentor Cybersecurity News bulletin and loves covering the latest events in cyberspace and data privacy.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address