We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

Blue Shield of California Exposed Data of 4.7 Million to Google

Blue Shield of California Exposed Data of 4.7 Million to Google
Husain Parvez First published on April 25, 2025 Cybersecurity Researcher

Blue Shield of California has revealed that a misconfiguration in Google Analytics caused the unintentional exposure of sensitive health information for 4.7 million members. Between April 2021 and January 2024, certain member data was inadvertently shared with Google Ads — without the consent or knowledge of affected individuals.

In an official breach notice, the insurer stated: “On February 11, 2025, Blue Shield discovered that, between April 2021 and January 2024, Google Analytics was configured in a way that allowed certain member data to be shared with Google's advertising product, Google Ads, that likely included protected health information.” The leaked information included insurance plan details, ZIP codes, gender, family size, Blue Shield-assigned account identifiers, medical claim service dates, provider names, patient names, and financial responsibility data.

According to TechCrunch, Blue Shield had been using Google Analytics to monitor how users navigated its website. However, a misconfiguration allowed the collection of personal and health-related information, including search terms patients used to find healthcare providers. The company acknowledged that Google “may have used this data to conduct focused ad campaigns back to those individual members.”

The Register further reported that Blue Shield’s setup “would send visitor data to Google Analytics,” which then forwarded it to Google Ads as a result of the configuration issue. In response, Blue Shield sought to calm concerns, stating: “We want to reassure our members that no bad actor was involved, and, to our knowledge, Google has not used the information for any purpose other than these ads or shared the protected information with anyone.”

Google, in a statement to TechCrunch, responded: “Businesses, not Google, manage the data they collect and must inform users about its collection and use.”

Although the incident was caused by a technical oversight, it still raises serious concerns about digital privacy in healthcare. Blue Shield's situation mirrors broader issues in the industry, such as the Norton Healthcare breach, in which attackers exfiltrated patient data during a cyberattack. While Blue Shield’s case lacked malicious intent, it underscores the risks of relying on third-party tools without thorough oversight.

The incident also invites comparisons to the 2023 HCA Healthcare breach, where patient data was deliberately stolen and sold. Though Blue Shield says it cut off the data flow in January 2024 and launched a system-wide review, it has not offered identity protection services and concedes that it “is unable to confirm whether any particular member's specific information was affected.”

About the Author

Husain Parvez is a Cybersecurity Researcher and News Writer at vpnMentor, focusing on VPN reviews, detailed how-to guides, and hands-on tutorials. Husain is also a part of the vpnMentor Cybersecurity News bulletin and loves covering the latest events in cyberspace and data privacy.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

This field must contain more than 50 characters

The field content should not exceed 1000 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address