We review vendors based on rigorous testing and research but also take into account your feedback and our affiliate commission with providers. Some providers are owned by our parent company.
Learn more
vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.
Advertising Disclosure

vpnMentor was established in 2014 to review VPN services and cover privacy-related stories. Today, our team of hundreds of cybersecurity researchers, writers, and editors continues to help readers fight for their online freedom in partnership with Kape Technologies PLC, which also owns the following products: Holiday.com, ExpressVPN, CyberGhost, and Private Internet Access which may be ranked and reviewed on this website. The reviews published on vpnMentor are believed to be accurate as of the date of each article, and written according to our strict reviewing standards that prioritize professional and honest examination of the reviewer, taking into account the technical capabilities and qualities of the product together with its commercial value for users. The rankings and reviews we publish may also take into consideration the common ownership mentioned above, and affiliate commissions we earn for purchases through links on our website. We do not review all VPN providers and information is believed to be accurate as of the date of each article.

AI Fuels a Surge in Hard-to-Detect Malware Variants

AI Fuels a Surge in Hard-to-Detect Malware Variants
Anka Markovic Borak Published on 2nd January 2025 Writer and Quality Assessor

Cybersecurity researchers have revealed that large language models (LLMs) can generate thousands of new variants of existing malware, which in turn helps the malware avoid detection. By obfuscating malicious JavaScript code, this AI-driven technique challenges traditional malware detection systems.

Researchers at Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 discovered that while LLMs struggle to create malware from scratch, they can easily rewrite existing malicious scripts, making them harder to identify. This transformation uses natural-looking code modifications like renaming variables, splitting strings, and inserting junk code.

Mainstream LLM providers have been increasingly enforcing security measures to ensure that their AI models aren’t used for cybercrime. In October 2024, for example, OpenAI reported blocking over 20 operations attempting to misuse its platform for malicious purposes. However, threat actors have simply turned to malicious AI tools like WormGPT to automate phishing attacks and create malware.

Unit 42’s study demonstrated the potential of LLMs to bypass machine learning-based malware classifiers. By rewriting malicious JavaScript samples, they fooled models like Innocent Until Proven Guilty (IUPG) and PhishingJS.

Beyond malware, AI tools face other security challenges. Researchers at North Carolina State University uncovered a side-channel attack named TPUXtract targeting Google Edge Tensor Processing Units (TPUs). By capturing electromagnetic signals, the attack reveals model hyperparameters and reconstructs AI models. While requiring physical access and costly equipment, it underscores the risks to proprietary AI technologies.

Additionally, AI systems like the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) are vulnerable to adversarial manipulation. Cybersecurity firm Morphisec showcased how fake external signals, such as random social media mentions of an exploit, and otherwise empty GitHub repositories showcasing exploits, could skew EPSS metrics, misleading vulnerability prioritization efforts.

The rise of generative AI amplifies the scale and sophistication of cyber threats. However, the same technologies can enhance defenses by improving detection of malicious activity — such is the case with NordVPN’s AI phishing prevention tool called Sonar. This arms race highlights the need for continued AI development and robust security measures.

With the development of AI, cyber attack techniques are also evolving accordingly. For instance, a North Korean hacking group named Sapphire Sleet recently stole over $10 million in cryptocurrency via a LinkedIn social engineering campaign that was enhanced with AI tools.

About the Author

Anka Markovic-Borak is a writer and quality assessor at vpnMentor, who leverages her expertise to write insightful articles on cybersecurity, driven by her passion for protecting online privacy. She also ensures articles written by others are reaching vpnMentor's high standards.

Please, comment on how to improve this article. Your feedback matters!

Leave a comment

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Name should contain at least 3 letters

The field content should not exceed 80 letters

Sorry, links are not allowed in this field!

Please enter a valid email address